Section 2 – AIX Multiuser Performance (rPerf, POWER8 and up). CPW results of IBM Power Systems servers running the IBM i operating. rPerf is a computer benchmark that evaluates the relative OLTP performance of servers based on IBM POWER microprocessors. It is published by IBM and. Section 2a – AIX Multiuser Performance (rPerf, SPEC CPU, . All performance measurements for the IBM Power™ Systems, IBM.
|Published (Last):||27 July 2006|
|PDF File Size:||3.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.36 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
These I will installed within next days, and will try to deliver performance update to. Bart February 19, at To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Actually, in the OS V7R2 no performance degradation noted either.
Continue to Wikis
Email required Address never made public. There is no difference again. This tool collects statistics delivered by the HMC, which are ibj processor cycles dispatched by the Power Hypervisor. I wrote a post how to collect it few years ago here. Notify me of new comments via email.
He can be reached at ccler kbm. Running industry benchmarks can be very expensive. The amount of rPerfs required to run existing workloads can be determined and used to size new servers. The first patch was delivered on January 9th. Today Jan 31st we applied the fix on few test systems. As you can pwer, there is almost the same utilization, no spectacular grow. Charlie Cler supports customers in a solutions-architect role at Forsythe Technology Inc.
Since IBM owns and controls the rPerf benchmark, it can report both actual and estimated data for Power servers. If not, a server reboot is needed. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
Do not forget that fixes for VIOSes were released as well. Cover letter again is very mysterious. Nevertheless, IBM has already delivered number of patches. The only way how to solve it, is to redesign the chip or patch the OS in the way that it will not allow to use this vulnerability. Of course, I have no idea what these or those PTFs fixed. Read The Current Issue: But in the fix description there is an information that an Operating System updates are required too. We have carefully put this patch to test systems and closely monitored the performance.
Note that rPerf can only be used for making comparisons within Power servers.
Getting the PTF on the system was a big question mark inm probably many users still feel uncomfortable with number of available information.
I will try to update this post within next days, because last Friday The main reason was to publish data for a broad selection of Power Systems servers. Having this comprehensive set of information makes it easier to estimate the commercial workload CPU performance for any Power Systems server.
As you can see, no significant grow after patching. Paul February 26, at IBM did not publish any official information about potential performance impact, neither how the security flaw was solved. Many benchmarks exist for comparing servers, so why did IBM create the rPerf measurement?
Jimmy May 7, at I did a query — show me the jobs which consumed CPU the most. Martin February 19, at In addition, most benchmark rules require that the full benchmark be run and fully documented for each published data point. There is almost no difference in CPU utilization.
The fix is concurrent as long as you run the latest release level. I just believe they did something. Unfortunately, Poweg is very conservative in published information regarding the vulnerability. If your workload is better aligns with two threads per processor core, you should consider reducing the published POWER7 rPerf numbers by approximately 15 to 20 poower to get a more reasonable representation of its rPerf value.