La tutela della dignità umana: fondamento e scopo della Convenzione di Oviedo. In: Furlan, E. Bioetica e dignità umana: Interpretazioni a. PDF on ResearchGate | On May 1, , R Andorno and others published La tutela della dignità umana: fondamento e scopo della Convenzione di Oviedo. Venti anni dopo la Convenzione di Oviedo / Equitable access, appropriate quality . Twenty years after the Oviedo Convention | Il diritto alla tutela della salute.
|Published (Last):||2 November 2005|
|PDF File Size:||12.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.82 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Genome Editing, Asilomar, and the Politics of Deliberation. The Convention states the principle according to which a person has to give the necessary consent for treatment expressly, in advance, except in emergencies, and that convfnzione consent may be freely withdrawn at any time. Translations sorted by non-official languages.
The Convention’s starting point is that the interests of human beings must come before the interests of science or society. The Convention sets out rules related to medical research by including detailed and precise conditions, especially for people who cannot give their consent. Science Logic and Mathematics. Added to PP index Total downloads 1 1, of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Nevertheless, at the time when a practical decision is imperative the physician might look in vain for guidance in legal theory and practice, which up to now have proved capable only of providing a highly contradictory gamut of solutions: For the most part, in this donvenzione the law intervenes “a posteriori” to evaluate in hindsight and with an outcome that is practically unforeseeable the penal implications of the situation.
On one side of the issue is the essentially dominant approach, which deduces from the clear expression contained in Art.
Neri Demetrio, Crispr-Cas9, la convenzione di Oviedo e le generazioni future – PhilPapers
The Model T of Biotechnology. It bans all forms of discrimination based on the grounds of a person’s genetic make-up and allows the carrying out of predictive genetic tests only for medical purposes. La Convenzione riconosce anche il diritto del paziente a non essere informato.
It prohibits the use of techniques of medically assisted procreation to help choose the sex of a child, except where it would avoid a serious hereditary condition. The only restrictions are those prescribed by law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interest of public safety, for the prevention of crime, for the protection of public health or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
The treatment of persons unable to give their consent, such as children and people with mental illnesses, may be carried out only if it could produce real and direct benefit to his or her health. Rodriguez – – Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 7 2.
Benjamin Hurlbut – – Hastings Center Report 45 5: Traduzioni ordinati per lingue non ufficiali. Firme e ratifiche Riserve et Dichiarazioni Rapporto esplicativo Protocolli. Convenione Guttinger – – Science and Engineering Ethics 24 4: Essa permette interventi di ingegneria genetica solo per ragioni preventive, diagnostiche o terapeutiche e solo quando il suo scopo non sia di modificare il patrimonio genetico di una persona.
Rivisteweb: Article Details
Details of Treaty No. Challenges, Ethical Concerns and Implications. The author tackles the theme of the refusal on the part of a patient of a certain therapy, when such decision produces a health hazard or mortal danger. Weiss – – Bioessays 36 1: Cases of this type pose a dramatic dilemma.
The treaty allows genetic engineering only for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic reasons and only where it does not aim to change the genetic make-up of a person’s descendants. What legal theory can nevertheless be reproached for is its frequent indulgence in considerations which may be of notable cultural significance, but which risk being misleading in the context of argumentation that aspires to be perfectly juridical.
The only exception is, under certain conditions, for regenerative tissue especially bone marrow between siblings. Sign in to use this feature. It prohibits the creation of human embryos for research purposes and requires an adequate protection of embryos where countries allow in-vitro research. Martina Baumann – – NanoEthics 10 2: The Convention recognises also the patient’s right not to know.
Ufficio dei Trattati, http: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. The Convention is the first legally-binding international text designed to preserve human dignity, rights and freedoms, through a series of principles and prohibitions against the misuse of biological and medical advances.
The greater the patient’s chances of being able to return to a normal life, and the more irrational the reasons for the refusal appear to be, the more difficult it is for the physician to respect such a refusal. Monthly downloads Convezione, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Ben Merriman – – American Journal of Bioethics 15 Sign in Create an account. Undoubtedly, to some extent this disparity of viewpoints is only normal in reference to such a oviedi emotional issue. Wade – – Bioessays 39 Scienza E Filosofia La sola eccezione si ha, a certe condizioni, per il prelievo di tessuti rigenerabili tra fratelli e sorelle.
La Convenzione vieta ogni forma di discriminazione nei confronti di una persona in base al suo patrimonio genetico e autorizza test genetici solo a fini medici. Additional Protocols are foreseen to clarify, strengthen and supplement the overall Convention.