Buy CLSI EP5 A2 Ed. 2 () Evaluation Of Precision Performance Of Quantitative Measurement Methods from SAI Global. Buy NCCLS EP5 A2 Ed. 2 () Evaluation Of Precision Performance Of Quantitative Measurement Methods from SAI Global. Buy CLSI EP5 A2: 2ED EVALUATION OF PRECISION PERFORMANCE OF QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT METHODS from SAI Global.

Author: Nigis Gardashicage
Country: Ecuador
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 23 October 2009
Pages: 405
PDF File Size: 7.27 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.36 Mb
ISBN: 401-2-64693-924-3
Downloads: 52570
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nall

Using the values from our example the mean of all the results is 1. Clsii dataset must contain at least two continuous scale variables containing the observations in replicate for a run of the method.

CLSI EP5 1- & 2- run precision | Analyse-it®

Observations for any day excluded due to outlier observations are shown as red crosses on the precision plot see above. The fields under manufacturers claimed precisions allow testing against a claimed precision. Run the Analyse-it trouble-shooter For customers When using quality control samples, these should be different to those used to ensure the instrument is in control at the time of the assessment.

If QC material is being used for the precision assessment, it should be different to that used to control the assay.

For the purposes of this example the results of only a single level are shown Table 1. For a normal distribution the measure of imprecision is the standard deviation SD. T is best calculated in a spreadsheet and is given by:. Click OK to run the test. For new licenses Buy new licence Check prices, get a quote, or purchase online or through an authorised reseller.


Evaluating Assay Precision

Acknowledgments Special thanks to Amanda Caswell for her careful review of the manuscript. The control panel for EP5. Use the menus to the right under Columns to tell Genex which classification column that corresponds to days, and which column corresponds to runs. The precision evaluation experiment is divided into three different periods.

On day 1 the mean of the three replicates was 1.

It is generally assumed in the laboratory that the variation associated with repeated analysis will follow a normal distribution, also known as the Laplace-Gaussian or Gaussian distribution. The powerful statistical analysis you’d expect from an expensive statistics package. Requests to do so should be addressed to the Editor. Download latest release Version 5.

Note that it is the absolute value of the variance that should be entered.

Evaluating Assay Precision

It looks like you are browsing from a non-Windows device. To compare precision against a goal: This period is intended for the experimenter to learn the experimental protocol, and also to put quality controls into place, and perform an initial evaluation of precision and other acceptance tests, e.


Summary When evaluating the precision of a method it is necessary to assess the repeatability within-run and the total or within-laboratory precision. The measurements continue for another 15 days. Latest blog post A22 5. Line 11 shows the same quantities as line 9, but for the total, within-laboratory, precision.

Repeatability Verification Value In order to compare the estimated repeatability to a claimed value we can calculate the critical or verification value using the equation: Finally, the last two lines indicate whether the claimed precisions were consistent with the precision estimated from the measurements.

The n and Days statistics are adjusted to show the number of days analysed and the number excluded from analysis. Summing the square of the differences gives a total of 0. Each level is run in duplicate, with two runs per day over 20 days, and each run separated by a minimum of two hours.

The figure of 5. Please review our privacy policy.